Server time: Mon Jul 22 2019 20:33:15 GMT+0000 (UTC)

Tucker Arensberg Attorneys | Firms | Attus

Full-Service Law Firm in Pittsburgh, PA

Headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA, Tucker Arensberg is a full service law firm with offices in Pittsburgh, Harrisburg and New York City.

Our clients are local, regional and national in scope. They include private and public companies in varied industries, including financial institutions; energy; manufacturing; health care; construction; real estate; education; government and non-profit organizations. We also provide estate and trust services for individuals.

Our heritage, longevity and reputation for excellence are the result of our focus on client service and our attorneys’ extensive experience with a broad range of legal and business issues across many industries. We are committed not only to helping our clients solve traditional legal problems, but also to addressing emerging subjects such as data protection, e-commerce and technology.

Tucker Arensberg’s more than 70 attorneys are dedicated to developing a thorough understanding of our clients’ businesses and industries, allowing us to deliver the superior level of client service that has been our guiding principle since 1900.

Practice Areas

Richard B. Tucker, III
Experienced appellate litigator having represented clients in all Pennsylvania Appellate Courts, the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.

Dick concentrates his practice in the field of litigation, particularly appellate litigation. He has argued cases in the United States Supreme Court, Third Circuit Court of Appeals, and the Pennsylvania Supreme, Superior and Commonwealth Courts. Dick has handled a variety of civil cases involving general commercial transaction claims, trusts & estates, letters of credit, insurance coverage, workers’ compensation, ERISA benefits and employment issues.

Representative Experience
Ferens v. John Deere Co. where he successfully argued before the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court agreed with our client’s position that a federal district court must apply the state law of the state where the lawsuit was filed even after the lawsuit had been transferred to a federal court in another state at the plaintiff’s request. As a result, an injured farmer was granted recourse using the longer statute of limitations of the state in which the lawsuit was filed and in which the defendant company did business. The statute of limitations in the farmer’s home state had expired.

Presentations & Publications
"The Supreme Thrill. Meet Seven Lawyers Who Have Appeared in the Super Bowl of Law", Super Lawyers Magazine.

One PPG Place Suite 1500, Pittsburgh, 15222, zcYQfJXYJL7hbJWhc, dc9kZKNj2qRb9PKim, postaladdress